User talk:Piguy101/Archive 2

PROD

How about you give me more than like 2 seconds to add a source. Okay?--Yankees10 02:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry for not waiting very long, as you seem to be a productive contributor. However, in my opinion, there should be at least one source in the article before it is submitted. Happy editing Piguy101 (talk) 02:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Sumita misra reference on Google

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJwNrXrILtA

http://www.chandigarhliterati.com/literati_2013.html

http://article.wn.com/view/2013/10/08/Now_Chandigarh_to_host_its_own_literature_festival_p/

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/Eminent-litterateurs-to-attend-LITERATI-2013-in-Chandigarh/2013/11/20/article1900211.ece

http://chandigarhliterary.blogspot.in/2013/12/sumita-misras-book-zara-si-dhoop.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.138.84 (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure what happened, but it appears as though the article was deleted. If is was not, go ahead and add these sources. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from Minandeen

Shk ajwad is the current najmul ulama of the al fassi family. You may find about him in the article by his daughter Dr hatoon al fassi. And in his Facebook alsheik ajwad alfassi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minandeen (talk • contribs) 12:37, 14 May 2014 (UTC) 

Recent edit to Dendrophilia (paraphilia)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! B14709 (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I am going to revert your edit because it made the first sentence into a grammatically incorrect sentence fragment. Regardless, the lead could be improved to a more readable sentence. (PS I hate templated messages because they do not specifically describe why the edit was changed.) Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. Sorry I made that mistake; I was being too hasty and I failed to read the passage thoroughly. And again, sorry for sending you a templated message. Thank you for responding politely, thank you for improving Wikipedia, and thank you for putting up with idiots like me. B14709 (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

No hard feelings. Piguy101 (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Death of Jamie Gao

The murder isn't notable for the victim, but for the alleged killers, and is receiving a bucketload more coverage than your average drug killing on that basis. Roger Rogerson is possibly the most notorious disgraced police officer in Australian history, someone who has repeatedly beat attempts to charge him with various violent crimes, and in recent years has made himself a celebrity out of those things. The other alleged killer is a well-known ex-whistleblower on police corruption. As a result, the public interest in this case - reflected in the amount of coverage all over every mainstream media source in the country - is far greater than your average drug killing and likely to stay that way. I also think, pre-empting the suggestion, that it wouldn't be a good fit for the Rogerson article, as a) having appropriate coverage of the trial would lead to undue weight on the Gao trial over everything else in Rogerson's story, and b) would disproportionately focus Wikipedia coverage on Rogerson over his also kinda notable co-accused, which feels like a BLP issue to me. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

No arguments here! The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Message from Annie90904

Annie90904 says: Actually I beleive Fatima is real and she is related to all the connections I talked about. If it needs to be deleted even though it's credible I need to know why. You can write about a specific person. Look up Princess Amira of Saudi Arabia you'll find her on here. What about a less known princess that is related to her husband? Not trying to be rude.:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annie90904 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Nothing on the page credibly indicates why she is important, so the page may be speedily deleted. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

She is real, she is just less well known. I saw Princess Amira on here and Princess Elizabeth but if it's a less well known Princess it's not allowed? Why is her page about to be deleted:( I don't get what I did wrong. She is a princess and a few people should at least know there are other princesses in the world...so why Annie90904 (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh I was about to talk about why she is important. It's my first article can u give me a week to change it? I'm kind of busy right now and I don't want this article about this sweet little girl who helped me deleted. It is important. Thanks Annie90904 (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Choose "Contest this Speedy Deletion" to argue why the page should be kept. Piguy101 (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm GiorgioMalvone. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sabina Pena, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - Giorgio Malvone (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Is this a templated message? I am not sure what you mean; I simply tagged the article for translation to English. I do not believe that I reviewed it. What is going on? Piguy101 (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Horkey article

Hi Piguy101

Thanks for note. I think the problem is lack of references? Any others? If I check Sybil Marshall's works and refer, will it be OK?

Pigdyke

Adding references would definitely help the article. Also, try to add to the article why Horky is notable. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Help

Need your help, kindly revert..! User:Divye0027

About what? Please give more information. Piguy101 (talk) 23:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Piguy101.

I am unaware of how to cite on Wiki, but the following is my registered trademark for my invention which I named in January 2007 and was issued registered protection from the federal government in 2009. for any use of Bullet Button in reference to "Firearm magazine locks" I own AssaultPlanet.com, Prince50 Designs, and Bullet-Button.com, all which stem From My inventions as Prince50. I am also the inventor of the precursor to the Bullet Button®, the Prince50 mag lock TM. Please contact me back at dlprince1@aol.com with any questions. I am Prince50 on Calguns, which is where I first released and named the Bullet Button®. Thank you for your time and the effort you put into reviewing this submittal.

Mark Image Word Mark BULLET-BUTTON Goods and Services IC 013. US 002 009. G & S: Firearm magazine lock. FIRST USE: 20070101. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20070101 Standard Characters Claimed Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK Trademark Search Facility Classification Code NOTATION-SYMBOLS Notation Symbols such as Non-Latin characters,punctuation and mathematical signs,zodiac signs,prescription marks Serial Number 77663672 Filing Date February 4, 2009 Current Basis 1A Original Filing Basis NO FILING BASIS Date Amended to Current Register October 2, 2009 Registration Number 3720328 Registration Date December 1, 2009 Owner (REGISTRANT) Prince, Darin L INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 5221 Triple Crown Drive Bonsall CALIFORNIA 92003 Attorney of Record Jason R Lee Type of Mark TRADEMARK Register SUPPLEMENTAL Live/Dead Indicator LIVE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.252.179 (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I reverted your edits for you added Darin Prince as the inventor, but did not provide a source. If you can find me a url that says this, I can help you add it the article, so the line can be referenced. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 19:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

PS-I see that you added a link: http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/firearms/regs/fsor.pdf. Unfortunately, neither the word "Darin" nor "Prince" appears in the pdf. Could you find a source that says Darin Prince is the inventor? Piguy101 (talk) 19:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Editing Kaan Onder

Hi Piguy..

Regarding Kaan Onder entries I have problems understanding why you delete the references linked to FIA ETCC official web page.. As you may know FIA is the International authority for the car/automobile racing.. What else then FIA page can be an acceptable reference for a car racer?

Thanks

N. Onder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cola1312001 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I did not remove your link additions to Kaan Onder. Take a look at the page history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kaan_Onder&action=history. You will find that the links were removed by XLinkBot, an automated program to remove links to certain websites. This is because sites such as facebook are usually inappropriate to add to Wikipedia. Please discuss this with the bot's operator, Versageek if you would like. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 22:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)