February 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Fly to the Rainbow even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello FlightTime, but sources are for the hard rock genre and not for heavy metal PieceOfMind83 (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

User 2607:FEA8:F225:A900:30E8:8A12:4C69:8618 added heavy metal genre in front of hard rock, both sources are for hard rock PieceOfMind83 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Blizzard of Ozz. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK. You won! 12 September is correct. PieceOfMind83 (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's 12 September. PieceOfMind83 (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Blizzard of Ozz. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Before you blocked me, look what Ozzy's official website says. PieceOfMind83 (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

No need to block me, just take a look at the artist's official twitter. PieceOfMind83 (talk) 20:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PieceOfMind83. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 20:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply