Welcome!

Hello, Ph.eyes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —Whomp t/c 21:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


List of Asian study, List of China Study edit

Thanks for your recent contributions. However, I have to inform you that these two articles are listed for speedy deletion due to the fact that they meet criterion A3, because they consist of simply links. I hope this helps. Thanks. —Whomp t/c 21:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


EBM edit

I recently noticed your adding a few pages to the Evidence Based Medicine category. I would like to know if you are skilled in this field of medicine, and whether you are interested in helping adding some more articles to this category. Please contact me. hujiTALK 10:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your message. I disagree with merging those categories too. I hope I can find some time to add some articles to the EBM category. hujiTALK 20:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please add content to your articles edit

Some of your aricles have been deleted because they just contain external links. Please add some content to them.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Invite to Nursing wikiproject edit

Rod talk 09:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cumulative Meta-analysis?? edit

Cumulative Meta-analysis article is contentless, and basically, what I should do is to suggest a speedy deletion of this article. You have added a link to it on Meta-anslysis as well, which should be removed. But prior to performing all this, I would like to know if you have a special idea by creating this article.

Please respond here, or on my talk page by Monday. Otherwise, I will continue with a speedy deletion of the Cumulative Meta-analysis article.

Regards, hujiTALK 18:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Per-protocol analysis edit

 

A tag has been placed on Per-protocol analysis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Copyright violation in Catfish Effect edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Catfish Effect, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Catfish Effect is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Catfish Effect, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Metabolic risk score edit

 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Metabolic risk score, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 14:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Think tank edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 23:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Open Source Bioinformatics software edit

 

A tag has been placed on List of Open Source Bioinformatics software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 5 albert square (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with List of Open Source Bioinformatics software. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Betamax (VoIP company). Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 16:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

The article List of Open Source Bioinformatics software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be an abandoned project; a short list of mostly non-notable software on an arbitrary topic -- why only open source bioinformatics software?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Interwiki links to nonexistent Chinese pages edit

Please stop adding interwiki links to nonexistent articles on Chinese Wikipedia. This serves no useful purpose, wastes people's time, and will just be later removed by the interwiki link bots anyway. Owen× 14:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reminding. I like to comment on this rule of Wikipedia. Add a nonexistent Chinese pages is just for remind me/others to edit it later. Otherwise, people will have no initiative to modify the item and I will just forget it.
(Ph.eyes (talk) 06:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC))Reply
I doubt that Interwiki links to nonexistent pages will prompt anyone to create those pages. If the only purpose is to keep a reminder for you, I suggest you create a list on your own User page as you have been doing so far.
If you really want to prompt people to work on an article, the best way is for you to start a one or two line stub, and categorize it under the proper stub category. This way, people will see it show up in the category page, and are more likely to work on improving it. Owen× 12:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Metabolic risk score edit

 

The article Metabolic risk score has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Comparison of online brokerages in Hong Kong edit

 

The article Comparison of online brokerages in Hong Kong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOPRICE, "Wikipedia is not a price comparison service".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Ph.eyes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Healthcare reform in China edit

@Ph.eyes:

Hi, I'm not sure if you're the one who initiated the writing of said article back in 2007. I did the translation into Traditional Chinese version last year, and now am conducting the editing of the translation. I'd like to ask a favor of you, or anyone, to get me the citation for "Several different models have been developed across the country to attempt to address the problems, such as more recent, local, community-based programs. ", I myself could not find any in the Net. Thanks.ThomasYehYeh (talk) 06:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply