Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peellegrini (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

When will I be unblocked? i am explain anything is need in it : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rowingasia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rowingasia/Archive :

  And, yes, what about the alleged connection to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی? Did you check? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

      I didn't know there was an alleged connection. In any event, the master and socks here are  Unrelated to the accounts confirmed by DoRD on January 4, 2016, e.g., Callderon (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

your admins blocked me in first time by wrong. mistake block : I didn't know there was an alleged connection. In any event, the master and socks here are Unrelated to the accounts confirmed by DoRD on January 4, 2016, e.g., Callderon (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC) Unrelated Unrelated Unrelated do you know unrelated? I am a victim of a malice of a user with another user. parsa amoli (پارسا آملی) with Mohsen1248. are you like waste your admins time and waste my time? How long do you want keep on cat and mouse game ? all of my edit is constructive. you cant find vandlist edit in my edits. thanks.

Decline reason:

You explained something at User talk:Rowingasia? That's interesting, since this account never edited that talk page. Also, whether or not you are related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی, there's plenty of socking confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rowingasia/Archive. To put it this way: Confirmed Confirmed Confirmed. We know "technically indistinguishable". Huon (talk) 22:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  Administrator note For any reviewing admin, please feel free to email me for more information. GABgab 22:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply