March 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:NGO Monitor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Reverting 24 edits by 13 editors without explanation is highly disruptive. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Exactly similar remarks apply to your vandalism at Talk:Gerald M. Steinberg. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. When I wrote the above messages, I was virtually certain that you were not a new user, but rather a returning user with a history of deliberate disruption returning for more of the same, but I decided to give you the benefit of what little doubt there was. However, once I saw your editing of Amiram Goldblum, there was no room left for doubt. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply