User talk:Pc kirby/Swiftlight (software)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Pc kirby in topic Discussion
To do:
- Add sources, to establish the notability of the software
- Remove promotional tone, by attributing opinions to the sources that gave them
- Fix reference formatting
- Add wikilinks, to other articles
Relevant policies:
- WP:NPOV - neutrality at all times
- WP:CORPORATE - notability guidelines for companies
- WP:COI - conflicts of interest
- WP:PEACOCK - avoiding promotional language
- Wikipedia:Software_notability failed policy on notability, still instructive
- Wikipedia:Software_notability essay on notability, just suggestions
Useful pages:
Discussion
editto leave a message, click edit, type your message, and sign it with ~~~~
- What changes / sources et do I need to make to complete this page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pc kirby (talk • contribs)
- A few things. 1, to respond to a comment, start a new line and add 1 more colon (:) than the comment above. This indents the comment for easy reading. 2, This software's notability is still in question. A single review from PC World is a good start, but a few more sources would be much better, especially coverage in non-technical places like a newspaper. Are there other articles, like you mentioned? Oh, and when you sign your name, just use four ~, not the 'nowiki' that's just to keep it from signing my name when I show you. Ocaasi c 13:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- i'll look for and add more sources .... Will these be better as external links or references? Thanks for all the additions. I note you've added quite a bit (pros / cons) from the review - which is more than i've seen on other pages. does this make the entry look more of a "long entry" rather than an encyclopedic reference? Pc kirby (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)pc_pc_kirby