April 2020

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cloud computing. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Java version history, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Java version history. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pbvasoya, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SWinxy (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Pbvasoya per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pbvasoya. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you addedΒ to SQL Server Reporting Services have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. π™³πš›πšŽπšŠπš–πšπš’πš–πš–πšŽπš› πšπš’πšœπšŒπšžπšœπšœ 11:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [2] MrOllie (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β PhilKnight (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply