January 2010

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Redvers (User), you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. matt (talk) 11:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requesting unblock

edit

If you are blocked and wish to be allowed to continue editing you should ask to be unblocked. Creating a new account to avoid the block is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and is itself a blockable offense. If you wish to continue editing please request an unblock on your original account: do not continue to edit from this account. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I've just got some valuable contibutions to make on the subject of chilled water first. Paul24112 (talk) 12:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, how about no?

Water

edit

Please use the talk pages discuss the changes you would like to make to water and related pages and get consensus before making the same edits again. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Edit warring, particularly the part about the three revert rule. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Osama bin Laden, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Polargeo (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked 3 days for repeated abuse of editing privileges. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Per [1], you are now indefinitely blocked as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 20:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply