December 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Junior5a. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Periodic Table of Science Fiction— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 15:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Storvreta. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Storvreta was changed by Pasupudefghb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949521 on 2016-12-15T15:20:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply