Owlman2015
April 2015
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Euryalus (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC) |
Owlman2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is ridiculous. I've never even met this Cali person. The only time I found out about him was on the Rolling Stone Article, where a user by the name of Flyer22 mentioned him as a possible owner of sockpuppets for abuse. I was skeptical of his claim because, as others, including Cavalierman and Bbb23 pointed out, he seemed to have a chip on his shoulder against that particular user (Bbb23 said he had an "obsession" with that editor) and can't be trusted to do this objectively. He even got a block warning from Bbb23. I'm not Cali, I've never met him, and I've never operated sockpuppets. I feel I should be unblocked. Owlman2015 (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser 
Confirmed sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.