Overcharm

Welcome to my talk page!

Thank you for experimenting with the page Tornado on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Wafulz 13:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Quit screwing with fonts and formatting. It's completely unnecessary and it's messing up pages.--Wafulz 13:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to break pages or fonts, or any other unproductive edits, you will be blocked for vandalism.--Wafulz 14:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Red tide, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Red tide was changed by Overcharm (c) (t) deleting 11090 characters on 2007-10-16T19:31:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. You may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Hebrew language, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Creating templates that alter the pages in a negative way would be considered vandalism, and they're not that hard to spot. Grinder0-0 21:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Bodypopping

A tag has been placed on Bodypopping, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non notable slang term

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vgranucci 16:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Michaelbusch 16:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Recommend Delete - not notable

is not a Minor edit.

And don't you think it might be a good idea for an editor as new as yourself to engage in a little discussion before hanging that flag on a page. 14,000 registered forum posters might be wrong, but I don't think they are: I think he's notable. Even by our standards. --Baylink 21:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wonga

A tag has been placed on Wonga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Hazel77 14:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

It is obvious that this account is being used for vandalism only. Therefore you have been blocked indefinitely. At the same time I have deleted all the templates that you created and moved Pope John XIX‎ and Military use of children‎ back to where they belong. At the same time I have reverted all the moves that you did to your talk page back here. While it is OK to archive or blank your talk page it is not OK to move them to article space or other users. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 10:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)