Our Panjāb

Lamba (surname)

It is a list of names, and all entries have that name. There are many such articles in Wikipedia. If you feel that the uncited geographical information should not be there, feel free to remove it. ... discospinster _talk 20:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind attribution but the doubt is still unclear while the article seems to remarked under WP:CASTE sanction but still article not follow the single insensitive without any single source to support either any statement, which explicitly carry out the self published sustainability. Our Panjāb (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't understand what you're saying. If your concern is that the article indicates the wrong caste, then you can remove that bit, but there is no need to remove the names. ... discospinster _talk 20:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

In a positive manner which remedies or precaution should be taken if I want to trim the exaggerated part of such irrational article if anyway possible. Thanks and regard Our Panjāb (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

If you don't mind what else can be more exploitative if the large body of article not contain even a single source which can be necessity to ensure the article is true or some kind of falsehood @[[User:Discospinster|Discospinster] please adhere me toward this complexity Our Panjāb (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

It seems we are unable to agree with each other on one issue. i want to take third party opinion so we can solve this dispute quickly if upu have any last opinion you can tell me Jassu712 (talk) 11:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

You are right in your own sense but what kind of dispute you think still unclear to sort it out please acknowledge me the best way it can possible~thanks and regard Our Panjāb (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

about Ranjit Singh ancestors to be honest i already checked different reliable sources from Hari Ram Gupta Kushwant Singh Ganda Singh Griffin almost all of them the first ancestors they mentioned is Ranjit Singh great grandfather budha Singh so i my opinion we should mention and start from budha Singh instead of other and according to reliable sources he accepted Sikhism for washed away his sin not to fulfill his father any kind of wish Jassu712 (talk) 12:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

This kind of interpretation is not recommendable but since you are doing on purpose iw would like to include you should explicitly ignore the family origin in the uppermost statement of history section rest of the section can be opted if any mutual understanding built up with the editor intermediating to the responsible viewer@Discospinster Our Panjāb (talk) 12:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

okay i agree with mediating @Discospinster i want to know his opinion Jassu712 (talk) 12:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

about Sukerchakia Misl

hey I read your message their is conflict of interest maharaja Ranjit is sansi Jatt or sandhwala jatt according to reliable sources not warraich before doing any other edit let's solve our conflict peacefully since we both want to contribute on sikh related page Jassu712 (talk) 10:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Before any further repulsiveness i want to adhere you its not about ranjit singh but phenomenally attribute the family background of Sukerchakia Misl as an whole spectrum weather its ranjit singh or any other historical figure, hope you understand what i am trying to elaborate to you as an friendly intervention thats it@Jassu712 Our Panjāb (talk) 11:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

we can't solve our conflict like this can we use third party? Jassu712 (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

first of all don't revert edit we have lots things ti deal with!! Wait i will come to you in couple of secomd Our Panjāb (talk) 11:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

okay brother Jassu712 (talk) 11:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok wait are you trying to approach on my social media handle sorry to say but we cant find any ultimatum to figure this complexity btw I am fre to help you if the termination is reasonable Our Panjāb (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

i guess we have to take third party help haha 😆 otherwise this is never ending debate Jassu712 (talk) 11:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

No thats so common to have such kind of disobedience toward each other interest and way to stimulate the working of different ideology, and i dont think ita any big issue *exception still exist@Jassu712 buddy Our Panjāb (talk) 11:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

yes you are right i guess then we have adjusted how about just mention only about from budha Singh i will not edit warraich page Jassu712 (talk) 11:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

or not to mention about sansi Jatt since theirs is lot's of conflict Jassu712 (talk) 11:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Just leave it i will appropriate your contribution as best it can be possible Our Panjāb (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok corresponding to this Which part of content resemblance you think its not applicable or outdate you are fee to express your thought anyway Our Panjāb (talk) 11:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

I would like know what is objective toward the morality of wikipedia do you think its reliable i want to know for integration of our community Our Panjāb (talk) 11:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

and we will not mention about sansi Jatt and warraich got in Sukerchakia page this is best for us Jassu712 (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

we can start from budha Singh and remove about other ancestors of Ranjit Singh since theirs is lot's of conflict although I will not touch warraich page and we have reliable sources about budhha Singh from Hari Ram Gupta bhagta Singh and Kushwant Singh book Jassu712 (talk) 11:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

If you want my real determination all of these stuff are dubious and irrelevant toward the modern proximity of our historical accommodation apart from thes i can help you to create any clan or article related to historical groups if you dont mind we can work as an duo to reinitiate the better contradiction thanks me later Our Panjāb (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

i just wanted to tell you i am no longer going to argue since it's going to waste our both time I just did some changes with explanation i didn't remove family origin section since you and other guy put so much effort i just did some little changes and added some more content Jassu712 (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok calm down I don't have enough courage with such rapid decision maker so i report you to spi attributing community so they can handle your critical case, be prepare they may be blocked you depends on them? So sorry @Jassu712 Our Panjāb (talk) 20:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

try if you want it's you who don't want to solve problem Jassu712 (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

i am also going to report you for threatening Jassu712 (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Ru kidding me you are the one who exaggerating the pov of Khushwant singh and Hari ram gupta if you are not familiar with WP:RAJ and WP:AGE i will partially recommend read the guideline carefully thats is my standard offer dont expect me anything from this commitment, do you understand what i am saying. Our Panjāb (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

i don't want to argue any more with you you can ask third party opinion if they said i wrong i will back down i promise but third party should be unrelated to us Jassu712 (talk) 20:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hi Our Panjāb! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sukerchakia Misl several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sukerchakia Misl, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. APK hi :-) (talk) 08:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for such kind acknowledgment but I actually i am bot doing on some purpose but in order to stabilising the content which impartially removed by that one suspect to manipulate the article glossary. Our Panjāb (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Note:Its my first priority to speculate the correct information and i am reverting to the last good version before @Jassy712 disintegrate the proximity of old information Our Panjāb (talk) 09:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sukerchakia Misl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You two are continuing to edit war despite my earlier advice. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Our_Panjāb reported by User:APK (Result: ). Thank you. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Sukerchakia Misl.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)