Ostoneo

is test

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ostoneo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Use the sandbox

Stop messing up Jimbo's page. Your edits don't need to be tested there, and your repeated edits look more like vandalism than tests in any case. --Onorem♠Dil 01:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism and repeated sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Hut 8.5 19:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ostoneo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong and this is a clear conspiracy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Rschen7754 21:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is rather self-explanatory. To be unblocked you will have to address that and your use of sockpuppet accounts as detailed above.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

For the benefit of admins reviewing any future unblock requests the sockpuppet accounts in question are Ostoneo0 (talk · contribs), Ostoneo1 (talk · contribs) and Ostoneo2 (talk · contribs). Hut 8.5 22:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ostoneo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know of your negative veiw towards me, but I say can my actions be really unjustifiable? Wikipedia can teach you to be bold and this boldness is all I was expressing, the sock accusations I have are nothing but conspiracy by 'the man'. 'The man' is the malevolent force of which I suffer. In my short time on wikipedia I discovered a great vasteness that was the community. This backround scene that edits the wiki is a bold and dedicated bunch, that I have but the utmost respect. But I noticed a deep plauge infecting the community. This plague known as 'the man'. To purify this man I have made edits which you may call 'vandalism', but I say its not vandalism, but heroism. This 'vandalism' is but an injection of the cure for 'the man'. Society is but a polluted mass these days and I only try to cleanse it. My actions are chaotic good at worst. So I say free me, I will edit constructively to this fine wiki, but not to 'the man'.

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to be nonsense. Carefully read the response to your first unblock request; your talk page is likely to be dsabled if you continue making nonsensical unblock requests. Your writing style seems to indicate that you are a child. When you are older, if a time comes when you fully master the skills needed to edit Wikipedia usefully, you can request the unblocking of your account. You will probably have to answer some hard questions about what you have learned and what you'll do differently, but when that future day comes, you'll be old enough and wise enough to answer those questions thoughtfully. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.