User talk:Oscarthecat/Archive 5

Richard Marx Article Vandalism

The user 63.3.69.133 has been vandalizing the article titled Richard Marx, over 100 times. Can you block this person? This person was supposedly blocked recently, but he still edits and vandalizes. Thanks in advance,

Candy156sweet

Resolution(band)

No sir it is a member outside of wikipedia that is harrasing me a peer if you will and he continulously calls my house and is threatning me. I appoligize if i wasn't clear enough.

Thanks Again Ajchrch

Hello,

my name is alex and i am the writer of the resolution band page and i was just wondering if u could clear my deletion log from the resolution (band) page. There is no longer an article only the deletion log and i am being harrassed by another person about the contents of the deletion log. thanks a bunch

--Alex C. (ajchrch)

Major Page Vandals

Oscar, could you please tell me how to find out who has done semi-recent changes, or find whoever did this yourself? If you go to Kingdom Hearts, there is, in around the middle-ish area, vandalism(s) about the main character and stupid things.--Furon 15:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Jamaat-e-Islami

Sorry I thought that the dispute had been resolved (no major edits/posts for weeks). Khazadum 18:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies if I've been too hasty in reverting the edit. I saw that there was no edit summary, and no explanation about the removal of the tag on the article's talk page. How about I propose removing the POV tag on the talk page, and we see if we have some concensus? Does that sound ok with you? Best regards, --Oscarthecat 18:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the initiative. I have posted my POV concerns that still remain on the Jamaat-e-Islami page. --Aslamt 12:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

FYI-[1]. Haphar 07:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Gladiator 2000

Never mind. Greetings! Morris Munroe 18:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

reverting me on Indie hip hop

why'd you revert me setting this to a redirect? the article is original research, and is merely a synonym for underground hip hop.--Urthogie 21:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think you understand what I'm saying: Not only is it orignial research, it is not capable of not being original research. Tagging it suggests it can be fixed, which it can't.--Urthogie 21:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay : if you think the article cannot be rescued at all, could I suggest that you propose it for deletion? --Oscarthecat 21:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

First off, I'm proposing a redirect, not a deletion. It's a notable phrase with an inspecific meaning. In addition, I believe that logical arguments can be had between editors on the talk page that result in a good decision, and that sometimes AFD isn't necessary if that happens. I think it would be a bit unfair if for you to be unwilling to discuss redirecting on the talk page, and pushing this into an AFD without a complete discussion.--Urthogie 21:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'm all for discussing, let's move this discussion to the article's tlak page rather than my user talk. --Oscarthecat 21:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 01:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

John Inman

You beat me to the punch & got all of those punctuation marks moved before I had a chance. I guess I'm the one who just got served (bad pun; I'm so sorry!). SailorAlphaCentauri 16:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Personally I perfer them before the full stop/comma, but I will make an effort in future to place them correctly. --Berks105 18:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Janice Olivencia

Hey, I JUST* started this article. Next time, please give someone time to actually write the article! I am removing the tag. Charleenmerced ^Talk 19:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Joss Fritz

You tagged this article for speedy deleted under criteria A7 - notability not asserted. As the ariticle does assert notability, I have removed the speedy tag. If you still think it should be deleted, I would suggest the proposed deletion or articles for deletion process. Natalie 17:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

It's definitely short, and unsourced, which is problematic. I don't know a lot about German history, so I couldn't tell you right off the bat whether or not this is a significant person. Natalie 17:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

CVG release dates

If you're going to mention CVG release dates, and my recent edits of them, please take a read of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Article_guidelines#Release_dates first! --Oscarthecat 17:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Marble Blast Gold

I've re added the NN tag, if you feel that the article is WP:Notable, then you should make it satisfy the primary notability criterion. McKay 15:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Task Force

Yo, I have seen your edits to Devil May Cry related pages in the past and I was wondering if you might be interested in joining Devil May Cry Task Force we need as much people as we can working together to speed the improvement of the DMC pages and the work I have seen of you is done very good, so what do you say? thanks for your time. -凶 23:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome! sorry for taking so long to reply but I was working hard on Devil May Cry trying to solve concerns that appeared at the article's Featured Article nomination page so I was kind of tied up, of to DMC again see you around! -凶 01:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Devil May Cry Featured Article nomination

Me again, I have been working with Devil May Cry after the opositions appeared in the FA nomination page, can you please take a look and tell me how many of the matters stated have been taken care of and what needs work, since you are a admin you have better understanding of these kind of thing than me this being only the second time I actually cooperate entirely to raise an article to full FA status, any help is appreciated, peace. -凶 03:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: handhelds and 7th generation

Handhelds are a different story ... sure look at the release date and say this is sixth gen ... but the harware is much more advanced than the sixth gen GBA handhelds are different for handhelds i know ive wrote this on the talk page on either the sixth or seventh gen. Handhelds look at the difference between the sixth gen handhelds and the DS and PSP release doesnt matter as much as the hardware. And nov. 05' is for the big consles handhelds are very different. Look at the differences at Comparison of handheld gaming consoles (keyword) Uber555 04:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) If it was up to me i would make the handhelds and the home consles diferent pages. As iv'e said amny times handhelds are very different than the home consles. Anyway im going to bed.Uber555 04:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC Yeah its confusing plus the guy (supernesplayer) keeps reverting it..... Uber555 20:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to History of video game consoles (seventh generation)

In regards to your edit, the lead section is meant to be a concise overview of the article, not part of the main body. This allows the same links to contained in the lead and the body. Please see WP:LEAD for more information. Just64helpin 16:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I spotted that the original article had repeated links (see here, e.g. links to Xbox 360 etc). Looking back at WP:MOS-L, you're quite right, links are ok to be repeated across sections. Thanks for the feedback. --Oscarthecat 16:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)