OptimisticComputer

February 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Canon EOS R5. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 15:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Copy/pasting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie

Follow-up: References to sites with camera or lenses image samples

Hi MrOllie, you archived my message in this edit without answering my question. If we don't remove the link to pixelpeeper on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-FS3 can you clarify how is this not arbitrary censorship solely based on the suspicion that the edit is made by someone who is affiliate to the website. Thanks in advance for not archiving this message without replying to it.

OptimisticComputer (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC) OptimisticComputer

I'm trying to answer fewer questions when they're peppered with insults, thanks. Please don't post here again. - MrOllie (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

MrOllie, I would really appreciate if you can clarify in which which way my question is "peppered with insults", because I really don't get it. I'm sincerely trying to understand the justification behind your editing, and my original question remains. Thanks in advance for your reply. - OptimisticComputer, 11:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)