An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Neoonyxalchemist (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
I have removed your comment on User talk:Neoonyxalchemist. I have done this in accordance with our policy of no personal attacks. Comment on content, not the contributer. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 16:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- In regards to your comment on my talk page, I believe that Neo has (or at least had) the potential to be a good contributor. Every time Wikipedia gains another good contributor, it becomes better. The better Wikipedia is, the more good contributors it will attract. It is a self-feeding cycle. Unfortunately, that cycle works the other way as well... J.delanoygabsadds 16:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your comments on User Talk:J.delanoy: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gwernol 16:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
blocked
edit You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)