Onbekend en Anoniem Persoon
October 2020 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Zəngilan, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 13:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020 edit
Hello, I'm Ganbaruby. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Timeline of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 14:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
I don't how that source works. I read it from Twitter about the villages but idk how the source can publish Onbekend en Anoniem Persoon (talk) 14:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you removed Shusha's de facto Artsakh government info. The capture of Shusha is not confirmed by a reliable source (Not Armenian, Azeri or Turkish media) at this stage so it is better to leave them on. Please don't remove it until a reliable third-party source has confirmed Shusha capture. --LOLCaatz (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Hey edit
Hey. If you continue vandalism like this and this, you'll be blocked from editing. Perhaps stop doing that? Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
The article The Great Return Programme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Poorly supported stub about non-notable speculative initiative. Fails WP:N / WP:V.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
November 2021 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sibel Kekilli, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics edit
You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.