Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. This is especially a concern at Jordan. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 01:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

Hello Omar.. I am Osamah Waqfi. from Jordan too.is there any job can do it the Jordanian here :) ..do you have anything to do? nice too meet you, my regards --O.waqfi (talk) 12:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Dolphi Day

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Dolphi Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 22:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:100 0178.JPG listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:100 0178.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 21:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply