Old enough 2

Please stop evading ...

Kay, you're blocked from editing here. You need to stop evading the block, read through WP:CLEANSTART and work to get your block ended. I'll be sending in the SPI later tonight.

On your recent posts, as I noted, your first edit was already in the article in a great more detail. Your second is obviously unsupported by the sources. Trying to use primary sources that don't mention anything like a list to support that claim is really reaching it though. Is there a list? Very probably! Various courts HAVE banned vexatious litigants from filing unless they meet certain criteria. Pro se isn't a blank check to do whatever you want, ignore advice and judicial and generally abuse the legal system. To implement those orders, there probably is a list somewhere to facilitate that. That's my personal view though, and I'm anything but a RS. Using two court cases that happen to mention one you were involved in (really, did you think we'd miss that?) as sources doesn't meet RS.

Please though, stop. CLEANSTART is at least 6 months of no socking, and you just keep reseting the clock. Ravensfire (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kay Sieverding for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.