I have been banned unfairly without no solid evidence

edit

Some moderators have falsely accused me of being Willschmut, with no solid proof. Their only 'proof' is that apparently, he edited similar things to the Ofra Haza wiki. And this somehow proves that he/she is me. The text that I have edited is straight up from 3 different websites: https://www.lyricsvault.net/php/bio.php?a=4493 https://mrbagelmusic.blogspot.com/2007/06/ofra-haza-im-ninalu.html https://www.jonkutner.com/im-nin-alu-ofra-haza/

Are you seriously saying that all of these three different websites are run by the same person? That would be such an absurd coincidence. Or maybe Willschmut just copy-pasted the text like me. The mods have handled this horribly as they also never mentioned a solid reason for banning me. Saying that I edited similar things is not a valid reason. I am a huge Ofra Haza fan who personally knows her family and I have been given this information by people who knew her, so I know exactly what I am talking about. I demand an answer from the mods because this is utterly ridiculous and nonsensical. Please consider what you have done and let me give some information about the singer.

ADDITION: Since I don't know how to personally message you, I am editing it here. I am sorry. I do not understand why you declined my request. I do not understand what I must do to convince you that I am not who you say I am. You also mentioned that 'I must understand what I've been blocked for' well I told you; I was blocked because someone thought I am Willschmut. What else do you want me to say? It's simple as that. Nothing more complicated. I am ready to do whatever it takes to prove I am not who you say I am.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfraHazaFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Falsely accused of being another user without proof OfraHazaFan (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.