Obgydd

Wikipedia:Three-revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Web.com. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- Satori Son 14:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I have placed a comment at the companies project page. In all cases I know defunct companies kept their articles, e.g. Ulead, Macromedia or Trellix. Please consider that a lot of work has been invested - including mine - in the content you keep deleting. You can't decide on your own whether information about Web.com is "encyclo worthy".--Peter Eisenburger 14:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to the article again were not helpful and can be considered close to vandalizing. I placed the defunct infobox in the article again. Besides, you cannot edit categories of an infobox in place. - I too made some streamlining to the text of the article.--Peter Eisenburger 14:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)