Nyanez1

Peer Review from Wen Xu

---

1. Quality of Information: 1 (Some parts not finished)
2. Article size: 1 (Less than expected)
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 1 (Not enough citations)
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding: 1 (Not finished but the Sihler's Method part is well organized)

_______________

Total: 16 out of 20