Nutellatoast
A tag has been placed on Locate32, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bonadea (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Locate32
edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Locate32, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Locate32. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chemtrail conspiracy theory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chemtrail conspiracy theory was changed by Nutellatoast (u) (t) deleting 10414 characters on 2008-11-28T18:58:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chemtrail conspiracy theory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. dougweller (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: [1]. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Prodego talk 20:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chemtrail conspiracy theory. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Verbal chat 21:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- I note that User:81.156.15.117 has just made the same edit. We can of course check to see if this is you, and if it is, you might end up with a much longer block for sockpuppetry and trying to evade 3RR. dougweller (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chemtrail conspiracy theory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chemtrail conspiracy theory was changed by Nutellatoast (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-01-09T19:37:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Chemtrail conspiracy theory constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 19:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Chemtrail conspiracy theory, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
You're all a bunch of twats. Wikipedia: The place for lies.