I was User:Unfriendly Aliens until a password glitch threw me back out while logging on here. This is NOT a sock at all. I wear them on my feet, put them in a drawer. I don't put them on Wikipedia. I need a Admin to help me move in here. Any out there?Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 06:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don't bite me, I'm new here and got thrown out by a glitch, and I 😘🥰 the Admins

ANI edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Licks-rocks (talk) 12:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Glitch, other people... edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuclear Sergeant (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If sock - had a glitch that threw me out. If other, had other people who has not heard of Wikipedia asking me to ask you about it, asking me to ask you all questions of varying nature to an extent that I did not know this was causing problems, making it difficult to contribute to Wikipedia. I'm on here from time to time as well. How can I be of help?

Decline reason:

You are blocked for trolling, not socking. And you were very much trolling. Courcelles (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 17:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apology for... edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuclear Sergeant (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Trolling? If so, which may be the case, was unintentional, since I had people begging me to ask you guys all manner of things. So, I do apologise for that. Someone saw me here, and me being a nice guy, is where this started. Again, I do apologise for this.

Decline reason:

You seem to be claiming you lack sufficient competence to understand your own edits. Fair enough. We'll leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  Confirmed to Unfriendly Aliens. --Yamla (talk) 19:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Two things... edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuclear Sergeant (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason the checkuser said sock is that I had thrown out the other account due to a log-on glitch, and I told people that long ago, and never used it at all, as directed, and as to the troll charge and not understanding how to edit, is that I was like the office "gopher - go for coffee, go for this, go for that", like the guy in the office who gets lunch for the other people in the office,(What office has no one doing work as a gopher?) here it was asking questions on here for other people. I've apologised for the appearant trolling due to this. I AM new at this. I was told that I was blocked as a troll, not a sock as well (2nd appeal), due to the glitch. Unlike some(I know you get those people,), I am trying to get this matter dealt with. How can I get this resolved? Thanks Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Fixed the formatting error on this duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 21:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3 things - Glitch in appeal edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuclear Sergeant (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Got hit by a glitch, while making a appeal here. Re: Sock charge: A glitch caused me to be thrown out as I logged in, was told that the sock situation was taken care of. Re: Trolling, edit misunderstanding: I was acting as a gopher for people. Thanks a lot for the help. Only trying to get this resolved. 😘🥰 Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying that you were editing for others? Was that to help people get around blocks? In any event, I don't see a benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you and you don't describe the edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Other people edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuclear Sergeant (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

A admin referred to people evading bans and blocks. This is to answer this matter: Someone saw me on Wikipedia, and the next thing I know is that all manner of people wanted me to act like a gopher and ask Wikipedia all manner of questions. If the sock thing can be examined, I had a glitch, examine some earlier contribs, and you'll find out about that glitch that threw me out when I tried to log in, and that some said that I had done the right thing and said to not use that account at all. As to matter #2, it was, as stated, people who have never heard of Wikipedia at all wanted me to ask Wikipedia all manner of questions, because I was and am a nice person. How can this be resolved, so I can get back on the job? You should see some of the questions that didn't make it on here, like, "How can I get Viagra w/o a prescription in the US?", Or the one about a old US Supreme Court case that was called Gibbons v Ogden. According to that one, the court had ruled that Federal Law is supreme, Not state law. Someone wanted to know if THAT case could be used to throw out all of the different states' legislation that legalized pot nearly all over the US, making weed, pot illegal again, since Federal Law still says it is illegal. I have one source concerning this question. Thanks for the help. As to other edits, I had intended to do gen. edits until someone found me on here. Can someone delete my old account so as to get rid of that sock crap? Thanks.Nuclear Sergeant (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please read WP:SOCK. In your future unblock requests, please describe the behaviour that led to your block, why it was against Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and what you will do in the future to ensure that it does not happen again. This will need to include your socking behaviour. Wikipedia users should not be asking questions on behalf of others: if someone wants to ask a question, they can do so themselves. Also, editors are here to build an encyclopedia, so questions should be tailored to fulfil that purpose. Z1720 (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What you describe as people wanting you to "act like a gopher", we call sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 10:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply