Some possible discussions are welcome

I'm confused by what part of my contribution you think was not constructive. Not only did I clarify the previous sentence, I also fixed an egregious grammar error. Are you at all familiar with iText or the project? The previous sentence as it stood implied that projects MUST pay a commercial license to upgrade - which is not true. I clarified that. The previous statement also did not mention why the license change in 5.0 was significant - which is because it requires full disclosure of your source. I wrote it using NPOV and correct grammar.--Ryangardner (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent actions

edit

Please be more careful with your reverting, warning of users, and handling of issues that you are not authorized to handle. You have reverted and warned editors about edits that are not vandalism such as [1]. Or issued a second warning, when no second warning was necessary [2]. Finally, you can not handle unblock requests as you are not an admin [3]. Nor can you issue blocks [4]. Please review the policy at Wikipedia:Vandalism. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sarasvati River, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.