Northtowner
Welcome! edit
Hello, Northtowner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
January 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Lumsden (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 'The Sources of English Lute Music'', 1540-1620. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, England), 1955. 3 vols. Volume I is the text of the dissertation, describing the sources and the style of
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Page rename edit
Hi, I noticed you recently renamed Alison Phipps (sociologist and feminist). I was wondering if Alison Phipps (sociologist) would be better as per WP:CONCISE and WP:NCPDAB? -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, thanks for the suggestion. I'm not a Wikipedia expert, so happy to concur. I put the double description in as they are both broadly in the British social sciences, and thought "sociologist" on its own isn't so immediately obvious as a distinguisher; also, the sociologist Phipps seems to be most associated in public discourse with her feminist perspective on the transgender debate. But as the "About" header now makes the distinction clear, concision can win the day, I guess. :-) Northtowner (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, can I change it to "(gender studies)", or does the distinguisher have to be the person rather than a characterisic? Northtowner (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)