Nonsenseshame
October 2008
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Turkic peoples. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 21:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
I explained my edits in edit summary. But to one falsely accuse me of be a sockpuppet, that is too much. Wikipedia needs some rules to actually prove something before accusing an inocent person.Nonsenseshame (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The one who clearly and reasonably explains edit is who is blocked of course. In wikipedia there is a tendency to edit and warn with different accounts like yourself did. In some serious place that could never happen. The most reasonable edit should prevail which is not the case in this nonserious place with this joke of a users who are themselves sockpuppets and then they dare to falsely accuse me of having another account written in some fucking language which is too discusting to even consider, not to mention discussing edits, and on your dissapointment, I'm absolutely not interested in anything related to afghanistan. Discusting edits must have been done by you with one of yours suckpoppet accounts, thats why you accuse others of having it. But it's absolutly not normal.Nonsenseshame (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)