Your article Michael Hill (soldier) is being questioned. Can you please supply some references to back up the statements made in the article. DJ Clayworth (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above article has been nominated for deletion. If you wish to comment please follow the link at the top of the page. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael corleone Hill

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michael corleone Hill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 03:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please do not recreate this nonsense page under any other name. Continuing to do so will get you blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael corleone hill

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michael corleone hill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dori ❦ (TalkContribsReview) ❦ 00:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Corleone Hill

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michael Corleone Hill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

July 2009

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Michael Corleone Hill, you will be blocked from editing. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of Michael Corleone Hill

edit
 

The article Michael Corleone Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability uncertain and unreferenced. No third party coverage found

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 21:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Corleone Hill

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Michael Corleone Hill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dori ❦ (TalkContribsReview) ❦ 23:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply