Noah hix
I reverted your removal of the speedy deletion tag on Doomsday 2012 as you did not indicate in the edit summary why you removed it. Please use edit summaries when you edit articles so other editors know why you made your edits. Thank you.--ukexpat (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article 12/21/12, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Nostradamus doomsday
edit A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nostradamus doomsday, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nostradamus doomsday. RedZionX 03:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
The Bible references break no rules; but this article has no sources or references whatsoever. If you could locate some reliable sources to back up your claims, the deletion policy will probably allow it to stay. As it stands, it has a good chance of being deleted as nonsense. RedZionX 03:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedZionX (talk • contribs)
AfD nomination of Nostradamus doomsday
editI have nominated Nostradamus doomsday, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostradamus doomsday. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gromlakh (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)