Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bell Helicopter Textron. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. - BillCJ 02:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a soapbox! Propaganda or advocacy of any kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view. You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. Please refrain from violating this policy, as you have done on Bell Helicopter Textron. - BillCJ 02:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I must say that although facts are facts people should consult the Wikipedia article on Karma (bad/good). Textron's stock wows and executive Michael Redenbaugh's resignation because of cost overuns with Bell's H-1 program for the navy are bad news for this company. Although this does not implicate the Mirabel Operation, I do believe that bad luck can be linked to bad karma (i.e. bad policies). - Nmramemphis
See http://www.projo.com/news/content/BZ_TEXTRON_SLUMP20_01-20-07_8L414EO.d5d8b6.html