Night Leon
Powerpuff Girls
edit"Give it up indeed Marco. There are many fans against flames like you. And we will put that out"
- Ha, so would I. And my fighting is the right thing. God doesn't care who is right or wrong. And since it is that way, there's nothing I can do about it but just to say that I'm right because I'm right. Do not forget that I would never back down from any challenge like what John Cena would say because I am a fan of John Cena as much as I'm a fan of the Powerpuff Girls. 05:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Reply, Powerpuff article
editYeah, i saw that Marcus had deleted several sections from the PPG article when i took a look at it yesterday. Of course, we COULD just put all the text he deleted back again, but then he would just take it away again. I think the best thing we could do is start another rant about his destructive edits on the "talk"-page, so that people will agree that he must not be allowed to edit the article anymore. Rattis1 07:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Get out of here Marcus, this is between me and Rattis1! Night Leon
- How dare you snap at and delete comments by poor Marcus. I must agree with him: you are insane. 70.101.160.105 01:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not. I had good advice with Treelo and he supported me. And I learned a lot from him. Mark my words, I will not argue anymore unless necessary.
RE: ranks and other issues
editIn reply to your message the "ranks" aren't really indicative of any power and only really serve to indicate who organises the project at the top level, otherwise it's fairly meaningless.
As for the ongoing issue with Talk:The Powerpuff Girls, I've been watching and noticing the edit war you have with User:Marcus2 for a while due to T-borg asking for assistance. My opinion is one that Marcus2 is wrong on the exclusion of the awards won/nominated for the show (though that info should be in a table given the noms/wins for the show). He is however right in particular to the near-exhaustive Cultural References section which is incredibly crufty and looks like trivia to me and someone due to it going up for peer review has already commented it out. The information about the ratings and demographics could be shortened as the article comes across as fairly one-sided and fanboyish with such info.
Thanks for your enquiry though, hopefully this helped and if you require more help you can ask User Talk:Yngvarr who has a good record for helpfulness. --treelo talk 15:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Be aware that I represent nobody in this discussion. Due to the ongoing discord between the users Night Leon, Marcus2, Rattis1 and other anonymous parties I feel that the discussion must cease on the debate as it has long since been about content and more about the fan credentials of each party.
From what I can tell, neither Night Leonn or Marcus2 should be editing this article if they cannot act civilly towards others, agree on content accuracy and not let their own personal opinions colour the article as a whole. As such, I am archiving the debate and would ask of the involved parties not to revive this particlar thread of discussion or make any further remarks towards other members. If any more uncivility is found on the talkpages, I will warn anyone who makes any personal attacks or shows no attempt to improve the article through discussion. As such, I may in the future may be issuing Night Leon and Marcus2 with warnings for personal attacks towards others after discussing this further.
Thanks for your interest in this article but please, do not use the talkpage or the article as shouting grounds for who's supposedly the bigger fan and therefore more correct. Fandom and opinion do not matter, only the facts. If you have any comments, please leave them here and not at my talkpage. --treelo talk 14:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Should Adult Swim task force cover anime and off-network programming?
editComments? Please visit this discussion. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Night Leon, it's been a while huh? You might remember adding your interest to work as part of the Cartoon Network Wikiproject here, since you did this there has been very little activity with few to none of the members participating or have been idle for some time and as such may be mothballing the Wikiproject as inactive. I'm going over the list for WP:TOON and need to know if you wish to still be a member. I know you mightn't have edited in some time (at least through this account) but I'll wait until 5th January 2010 to see whether or not you still wish to be a part of this or not. If you don't respond to this notice specifically by mentioning it at WT:TOON (not my talkpage or here, I won't be watchlisting talkpages) or removing your name from the list I'll assume you are no longer interested and will remove your name. Hope you decide to work here again. treelo radda 18:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)