A tag has been placed on Jpb consulting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 16:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I don't remember the content of your page that well but as I recall it wasn't really in line with WP:SPAM and WP:CORP. The first of those problems is kind of fixable but the second one probably isn't, unless your company has been the subject of nontrivial coverage in reliable, independent sources. The administrator who actually deleted the article is User:W.marsh; you'd probably be better off talking to him about it. Just FYI, if you want to communicate with someone, you should leave a message on their user talk page rather than their userpage, eg at User talk:P4k rather than User:P4k.--P4k 22:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
If there's no independent coverage then yeah, that does bar it from having a Wikipedia article, and there isn't any way to get around that. Wikipedia is intended to just be a place to repeat information that has already been reported elsewhere. Wikipedia:No original research explains this. Sorry.--P4k 05:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)