Neckelodeonn
February 2023
edit
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Song Hye-kyo did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Neckelodeonn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Song Hye-kyo that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that in this edit to Song Hye-kyo, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Song Hye-kyo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)