Welcome!
Hello, Nanowicht, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! ErikHaugen (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Academic publishing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 12:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scientific literature, you may be blocked from editing. If you wish to start a new article on the social construction of scientific knowledge you can do so, but please stop adding this irrelevant material to existing articles that are about something else entirely. Your edits are unconstructive to say the least and will confuse readers. As I have already explained, disruptive editing counts as vandalism. andy (talk) 15:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I want to make a comment about these warnings, which are unnecessary since the editor has not done anything to earn a warning. The edits in question are absolutely not vandalism. "As I have already explained, disruptive editing counts as vandalism" - No! These are good faith edits; whether they are appropriate for their respective articles is another question and can be discussed civilly. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)