Nam Việt 18

February 2018

Hello Nam Việt 18. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Cantonese people, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nam Việt 18. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nam Việt 18|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Further, it appears this account may be one in a sequence of accounts used for the same edits. Abuse of multiple accounts is not allowed; as a general rule, a user should edit from one account and one account only. —C.Fred (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• One more thing: be careful with terms like "criminality" in describing other users' edits. Wikipedia also has a strict policy prohibiting legal threats; any user who threatens legal action or criminal charges against another editor or against Wikipedia can be summarily blocked until the threat is rescinded. —C.Fred (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I am not paid for contributing nor a member of an official organization. I was informed that since 2016 the CCP has started a wide range internet and web action to promote the chinese point of view/propaganda in sinocentric way. It seems that also here on Wikipedia are since a time manny accounts acting under false flag operations. The same happens on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, chinese owens news agencies and other web pages. I feel to act against this happenings and started today this account to counter the chinese project. This is probably part of the CCP northeast and southeast project, which also caused trouble with koreans and the korean Gouvernement. On same time also other accounts was created bur seems to be false flag accounts which hide the true operation. I hope Wikipedia is prepared and secure, please help to defebd neutrality. Controll sources and content, often no one relize the change or the change of meqning of sentences. Thank tou for understanding.Nam Việt 18 (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Cantonese people, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)