Your comment on Jgstokes

edit

Do you really think it's a good idea to make personal attacks about an editor who you yourself are accusing of being uncivil and passive aggressive? I hope you see the irony in that. I had a delighting conversation with Jgstokes and I think others would to if they simply remember to assume good faith. I'm not religious either but everyone, regardless of their spiritual affiliation, has the right to edit Wikipedia. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 22:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I do think it's a good idea. As a matter of fact, it's a great idea. Now, go get undressed and walk across the street. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you're trying to get blocked, you'll need to insult me better than that. Obviously you're a WP:SOCK. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 22:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not trying to get blocked, you slap-happy feral cat. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

NachoSchoolBus you wouldn't know it, the way you're doubling down and assuming bad faith. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please, stop vandalizing my talk page. I'll report you. You've been warned. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

NachoSchoolBus talk pages are for discussion, and that's what I'm doing. It's not at all WP:VANDALISM. If you want me to stop commenting though: bye   โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'd love to continue this conversation over a warm beer. Do you by chance live in Clovis, New Mexico? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately I don't and the closest I've been is Albuquerque, a long time ago. And I'd prefer a cold beer if you're buying. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Consider it done! I'll meet you in your home town in half an hour. NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

NachoSchoolBus Eh I'm more than half an hour, I live in northern California. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

How about tomorrow? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tell you what, you come here, I'll buy you a nice toasty joint. I hear that recreation is pretty new to you New Mexicans. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

No. I don't smoke weed. I'm 87 years old NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sounds like a good reason to start if you ask me. XD โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Great, now I'm blocked. Can you help an 87 year old brother out? NachoSchoolBus (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have to say you probably deserve a temporary block based on Wikipedia policy. Probably not indefinite though. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

WP:DUCK. I suspect a sock account, as you yourself did also. -- Longhair\talk 23:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

On those grounds the indefinite block is certainly acceptable. โ€“โ€“๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐——๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ(talk) 23:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Based on this edit, imo this is obviously a sock of GeraldFord1980 (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeraldFord1980/Archive). --FyzixFighter (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ย Longhair\talk 23:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

`

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ย Longhair\talk 23:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- TheresNoTime ๐Ÿ˜บ 00:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply