NSM RU

Note about adding defamatory content

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

have in my possession a lot of supporting material, that is in fact not defamatory but a consensus opinion. The company is operating illegally, you can inquire on such fact with authorities. NSM RU (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi NSM RU, to begin with, in order to understand the standards expected, especially when making serious allegations about living people, I suggest you carefully read the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. In regard to contacting the authorities, I'm not a journalist, that is my role does not involve asking whether the authorities are conducting an investigation. Wikipedia isn't a site that publishes original investigative journalism. I suggest that you read the Wikipedia:No original research policy to more fully understand this. PhilKnight (talk) 12:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Phil. I understand that perfectly. But it looks like you taking sides here with creator of the article who pursued and manipulated Wikipedia to promote Get-Rich-Quick scheme she is affiliated with.

Which had no notable source or verifiable information to approve the creation of such entry. I apologize that I did something any honest person who knows more details would have done. NSM RU (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

You like it or not but appearance of this article gave a powerful weapon for recruiters into the scheme, Some of them even used the claim that Wikipedia endorsed Uinvest.

This entry contributed to growth of amount of future victims. Let me quote some of places you can find on google

"For the first time in the history of online investments,we finally have a genuine way of investment. Uinvest is now listed and described fully on wikipedia due to its legitimacy and outstanding performance in delivering its services for the past 5 years."

"Wow,Wikipedia has verified Uinvest,Invest with confidence and Make real Money."

" Wikipedia has now verified Uinvest, the program that has made me rich today. This really proves that uinvest is not a scam and will never be. As you all know,wikipedia provides valid and trustworthy information to the public, therefore i can now boldly take all my money to online investments at Uinvest with confidence."

I hope you see my point and understand that something should be done about this. NSM RU (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

AfD discussions are for discussing the merits of the article, they are not for libellous statements about the subject of the article, nor for your own theories about the real-life identities and motives of other Wikipedia editors. Given that the Uinvest article currently has a big red "this article is being considered for deletion, click here to read why" warning and the AfD currently has zero arguments in favour, I don't think this article will be convincing anyone, or existing on Wikipedia for much longer. --McGeddon (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

...and it's gone. --McGeddon (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)