User talk:Myanw/Archive1

Welcome! Hello, Myanw/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User Pages The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style My FAQ Page Glossary What wikipedia is not Requested Articles Reference Desk Assume good faith Sandbox (This page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or an experienced wikipedian like Sango123 and JoanneB and leave your message on our talk page. Again, welcome! If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page Once you've become an experienced Wikipedian, please take your time to visit this page: WikiProjects Anonymous_Anonymous

subst: when using TestTemplates

I was just about to warn a user that you had previously warned, but you snuck in and warned him just ahead of me. =) Nice catch. However, I noticed that you don't always subst: when you issue warnings. You should always subst: when using the TestTemplates. -- Gogo Dodo 20:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: No worries. =) I missed the policy the first time, too. I believe there are couple of bots running that will find your warnings and change them to subst: so there is no need for you to fix the old warnings. If you really get into vandal fighting (it looks like you are), you might look into some of the tools that are available. I personally use popups and ARV, but there are many tools out there. -- Gogo Dodo 20:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome ;-) - Myanw 20:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: Just a little payback. =) That was an odd article. Normally you don't see such odd edits last for a couple of days. I think it was the obscurity of the topic that caused the long delay in cleaning things up. -- Gogo Dodo 06:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

see proof before reverting!

do not start reverting war!

I replied on your talk page User talk:71.99.115.10 - Myanw 16:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Myanw, I added some content to this page re Hidenburg and Robert Myers keps reverting it. H ehas previously had nil to do with this page but has previously been vandalising multiple pages I have put posts on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

Hello, can I ask you to sign your message next time? Thanks - Regarding your edits on Battle of the Hindenburg Line my problem is that the name of the Australian captain is not relevant IMHO, is he notable enough to be named in Wikipedia? If you can prove he is, I'll have no further objection - Cheers - Myanw 12:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes he is not just about that he led that attack but that he also wrote many of the unit histories for the Australian Forces in WW1 and is archived in our National war museum as well as in the Battye Archives in Perth. He was also awarded an Order of Leopold (Knighthood) and Croix de Guerre for his actions in France and the Hindenburg battles. He was a noted Journalist and War Correspondent and was mentioned multiple times in the official Australian history of WW1 by Australia's official war historian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

Ok then, I suppose you already tried to create an entry for this man? If not, try to do that first and don't forget not to do any personnal attack, even if I understand you may feel frustrated by the reverts, you'd rather bring a request for arbitration instead - Myanw 12:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I can't because whatever I post here, Robert Myers or Atktos or longhair, delete. I thought the rules here were that everyone can post stuff. I have been amazed by the aggro from some admins here and how they get away with totally vandalising pages. If I try and put anything up for Cyril Longmore here it will just get taken straight down. It is ridiculous. Its not that I feel frustrated. I am under constant personal attack by the three above people. Is that how wik runs? Note the tone below re "The IP is the same Anon". I have not been blocked at all the last week. If that is because I avoid reading messages they send me, that is because the first couple I read my computer security disconnected me from wik and when I logged back on, my remote access had been changed enabling access into my computer by anyone. (i.e. there was something in the messages that my computer security objected to. As I am on a uni network of our largest Oz Uni I am obliged to not infect their system hence my computer security and my reluctance after the intrusions into my computer from wik to open many sites here that lead to the personal computers of other editors, especially given the attacks on me. There was some nonsense re me being on a uni server or something, (I am for the purpose of my communication with that uni but not for the purpose of me logging on to wik). My IP changes as I am on dial up Internet which resets regularly, not for any other reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

It appears that there's a pattern in common between the said blocked user and yourself in the way you edit articles, that's what leads certain contributers to consider the both of you to be one single individual, if you're indeed the said blocked user, I advise you to cool down and wait for the end of your blocking period, if you're not, please post a request for arbitration and try to sort things out peacefully (and please, one more time, try to sign your messages on talk pages, it's not difficult, you know just under the "show changes" button, there's a "sign your name" thingy, try clicking on that ^^) --Myanw 13:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • The IP is that same Anon. The person using the IP has been blocked a number of times by Admin's over the last week. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/203.54.*.* -- RobertM 12:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • A number of the 203.54.*.* have been blocked a number of times such as User:203.54.186.138 block. The same IP (203.54.9.1) tonight vandalised the Wagga Wagga page which was totally uncalled for. -- RobertM 13:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I TOTALLY ADMIT THE ABOVE ROBERT MYERS AS YOU KNOW I DO. IT WAS TO TEACH U SOME EMPATHY AND RESPECT. DID IT WORK? ISNT IT A REAL PAIN WHEN SOMEONE DOES THAT TO STUFF U HAVE SPENT AGES ON TYPING IN. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR EGO BELEIVE IT OR NOT, IT IS ABOUT GETTING THIS INFO UP HERE IN AS GOOD AND CORRECT A MANNER AS POSSIBLE. IT IS NOT ABOUT SLANGING RACIST COMMENTS AT HIGHLY REGARDED AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS ELDERS OR FIGHTING WITH ME OR POSTING UP MAJOR INACCURACIES JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE MADE ERRORS IN BOOKS, BUT ABOUT THE PREVIOUS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

• • I am not racist! I respect the Indigenous Australians. You have never given any prove of your sources. -- RobertM 13:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • They are the blocked user. They just return with a new IP. Also they have been told to sign there messages but they always fail to do so. -- RobertM 13:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

ROBERT MYERS. IT IS MY TELCO ASSIGNS MY IP, NOT ME. I AM NOT POWERFUL ENOUGH TO ASSIGN MY IP BELIEVE IT OR NOT. I AM A 55 YEAR ODL GREY HAIRED WOMAN WITH A LOT OF ACADEMIC AND PRACTICAL SKILLS, A MESSED UP ARM WHICH MESSES MY TYPING UP AND A LOT OF CONTENT HERE TO POST HERE FROM THE AUSTRALIAN STUDIES/ARCHAOLOGY/HERITAGE/SOCIAL SCIENCE/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE QUALS I HAVE ACHIEVED THE LAST 10 YEARS. I DO NOT PLAY WAR GAMES ON THE INTERNET NOR IS IT A HOBBY OF MINE AND NEVER HAS BEEN AS HAVING BEEN IN THE ADF, I DONT THINK WAR A GAME, LIKE SOME DO. ITS PROBABLY TIME YOU BACKED OFF WITH THIS WAR YOU HAVE BEEN WAGING HERE AND FOUND SOMEONE NEARER YOUR OWN AGE TO FIGHT FIGHTS WITH. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

• • All you have to do is dissconnect and reconnect to get a new IP to avoid the block. I have never tryed to pick a fight with you. -- RobertM 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

SO I AM TO NOT LOG ON TO THE INTERNET EVER TO PLEASE YOU? ONCE SOMEONE TRIED TO GET ME TO STAY WITHIN MY GATE AS I OFFENDED THEM AND THEY JUST GOT OFF MULTIPLE S.9 BONDS. THEY ENDED UP GOING TROPPO AS THEY WERE ARE ALCOHOLIC AND THEIR MIND WAS STARTING TO CONK OUT. IF I LOG BACK ON TO THE INTERNET WHEN I GET HOME FROM BEING OUT, OR TO DO SOME MORE UNI WORK, I WILL. THAT IS NOT TO YOU TO TRY AND REGULATE. IF YOU HAVE COMPLAINTS WITH DIAL UP INTERNET CONNECTIONS, DISCUSS THEM WITH THE OZ TELCO REGULATOR. I HAVE MY DIALUP AS ITS ALL I CAN AFOFRD PLUS I HAVE THIS THING ABOUT REVERSE ENGINEERING. DONT U THINK YOU ARE BEIGN A BIT UNREASONABLE? IF YOU STOP FIGHTING THERE WONT BE BLOCKS. ITS NOT ME NEEDS BLOCKING AND U KNOW THAT. DO YOU ALWAYS FIGHT WITH OLD WOMEN? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

• • Since the Anon cannot prove that the information is true (A URL to the source) i will continue to revert the Battle of the Hindenburg Line page. -- RobertM 13:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

THE CITATION FOR CYRIL LONGMORE IS ALREADY POSTED. THERE ARE MORE CITATIONS IN BEANS HISTORY OF WW1 AND AT BATTYE LIBRARY, AND AT AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL AND ON GOOGLE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

• • Please link to the story/article. -- RobertM 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

ITS LINKED ALSO —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

Sorry dear, but in the URL you provided, nothing was said regarding the contribution of Cryril Longmore in the Battle of the Hindenburg Line --Myanw 14:12, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes there is...open the url then there are two clicks from that. That is how that archive works. That url takes u as far a syou can go then the clicks open pop ups as that is how it works. Its a uni archive open tot he public. I will open it then put here what to click —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

Now someone is deleting what I put here. Smart eh.

The URL is:

http://dtl.lis.curtin.edu.au/F/PN3M5QNSU6YN71B9DKRGBG8KA26Y2ATPDEUBXTCX2RDKQPG2AJ-01560?func=direct&doc_number=000000680&current_base=ERA01WEB

That takes u to a page with 'Correspondence of Cyril Longmore' underlined on it. Click that.

That takes u to a page with a white arrow on red circle. Click that.

A page opens up with a document icon in top left corner. Click that.

The 24 pages of letters then appear.

I went back and he had reverted it again. This is the citation at end of page on my version.

^ John Curtin Ministerial Library, Electronic Research Archive,Correspondence of Cyril Longmore, letter to Sir Henry Gullett, pp 1-2 Available [online] http://dtl.lis.curtin.edu.au/F/PN3M5QNSU6YN71B9DKRGBG8KA26Y2ATPDEUBXTCX2RDKQPG2AJ-00463?func=direct&set_entry=000011&doc_number=000000259&current_base=ERA01WEB —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.190 (talk • contribs) .

• • what page is this information on? -- RobertM 14:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Read the citation Robert. That is informaiton in citations.

I followed your walkthrough but to no avail, not a single page of the 24 you mention appears, please note that it might be a problem with my web browser, as I'm unable to use Internet explorer at home, the site might not work properly with "alternative" browsers --Myanw 14:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, I am on XP and no probs. Also opens on other 1998 computer with W98II no probs. As the are pop ups they arent easily captured to post here.

Ok it works with Opera, reading it now --Myanw 14:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I will read it later today, http://jcpml-link.lis.curtin.edu.au/dtlimg.pl?a=JCPML00511%2F1&zoom=100&p=1 -- RobertM 14:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Note the letters are in John Curtins file so Curtins

That first letter is to Minister for Information (Intelligence) who was also a Western Front hero so he would have known what Cyril did.

Also letter in there to Bean, and one from bean (official war recordist)

Heaps records at Battye Library (LISWA).

• Okay, here's the transcription of what I read :

« (...) I served abroad with the 44th Batallion, A.I.F., as a machinegun officer and company commander, and was engaged in a front line capacity in every major and most of the minor operations in which the battalion participated. For a period I was adjutant and in the final fight for the Hindenburg Line acted as second-in-command and was in charge of the front line troops. (...) »

It seems rather conclusive to me --Myanw 15:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I see nothing about about him bering from Gundagai however. I will let others look in to it. -- RobertM 15:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

He is on the Gundagai Cenotaph. To be put on a cenotaph you be born at thta place. However, though I know Cyril was born here, he is down as being born in Melb. and his name was changed from Andrew, to Cyril. (He had rheumatic fever as a kid plus his dad was violent so they changed details a bit.) His Mum made him 3 yars younger than he was and changed his name so he had a chance at getting a job. Rheumatic Fever affects your heart so on paper, he wasnt a good employment prospect till he had an ID change. Hi s brother had his head shot off at Quinns Post at Gallipoli so Cyril decided he was going OS too. The army hadnt let him go as he was their top gunnery instructor. He threatened army he would find another id and enlist under that name if they didnt let him go. In reality he is Andrew Longmore, but offically he is Cyril Longmore. He is on our cenotaph under the Cyril name but notes re his letters from the Somme back to Gundgaai etc id him as Andrew Longmore. (His father was also Andrew hence that name change re the violence.) I dont say he was born here though I know he was. He was very much from here. Not in Butchers book, his brother is.

"An ex Gundagai man, Lieutenant C Longmore, writing from France to his Aunt, Mrs Ern Brooke of Thuddugra, says he is with his Lewis machine gun section in the firing line in France." 'Gundagai Independent' 8 August, 1917.

We dont get our military history wrong as we are an adf family.

From his war record:

Order of Leopold, Chevalier, Conferred by His Majesty, King of the Belgiums CAG 9/18 MO42/18

Croix de Guerre, Conferred by His Majesty, The King of the Belgiums, Captain Cyril Longmore.

The above has been promulgated in The Commonwealth of Australia Gazette, No. 110, dated 25th July, 1918.

Dear User:203.54.*.*, I'm not an administrator of Wikipedia, I just tried to settle things between you and other contributors and even though I think rour refercences are valid, stop calling pepole vandals, please - Myanw 17:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. :) Viridae^Talk 10:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• You're welcome ^^ - Myanw 10:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks :) - FrancisTyers · 19:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome

Like it says! Enjoy today -- Nigel 12:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

But I see he is back on London again so I just _hope_ your day will be good -- Nigel 12:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Thought a sense of peace was around! PS for someone with so few Wiki boxes (<g>) I agree with quite a number but - and no war wanted - why do you use IE! Take care -- Nigel 13:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

OK I forgive you! And I share your shame - I have been know to edit from work but at least I can still use Opera of Firefox! -- Nigel 13:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Dont do it again

Dont spam articles like you did with the Undertaker DVD article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Warmon (talk • contribs) .

• I replied on your talk page - Myanw 06:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping revert 69.234.151.44. S/he was getting too fast for me to handle! Shadow1 19:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Belgium

Bonjour, On a pris l'initiative de créer WikiProject Belgium, si vous voulez contribuer vous êtes vraiment bienvenu!Pour le moment, on craint un peu que nous manquions des contribueurs Wallons et Francophones... Pour le moment, tous ceux qui sont inscrits, sont des Flamands (=Belges néerlandophones). On ne veut pas donner l'impression que ce soit une organisation pro-Flamande qui veut contrôler tout ce qui concerne la Belgique:), c'est donc pour ça qu'on veut inviter les francophones tout de suite. On voudrait y travailler en anglais.

Donc si vous en avez envie, ajoutez votre nom sur ce liste! Evilbu 23:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Indig Aust

Hey thanks for your help - do you think its worth giving warning or putting to Reporting v - it was all so quick! SatuSuro 15:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

OK - we have had problems at this article forever - but this one was odd - using german! SatuSuro 15:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Likewise, good job. Speed of reversion is powerful in these situations. I must look into edits and see why a belgian is so attentive to australian articles. Regards Fred 15:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help - and -hanks for explaining to him - he lives downby the sea - I live up in the hills - I'll have to explain RC thingies to him perhaps :) SatuSuro 15:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for catching the Dog vandalism

I should have read the article before I reverted the last edit...yeah lots of vandalism on that page... thanks for reverting further Dzubint 14:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi

You seem to be catching quite a few of the vandals edits at the mo, good job :) - JVG 15:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Mais soyez-vous prudent! Ceci n'est pas Wikipedia:Vandalism. Veuillez-vous employer le sommaire "rvv" uniquement pour vandalism pure. Mille mercis et à tant tôt! Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 17:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Second! Teke ^(talk) 18:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

I'm sure you meant to warn someone else, no?--172.165.169.16 19:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Please consider also warning vandals

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. Could you also please consider using our vandal warning system [1]? First offenses get a "test1," then a "test2," followed by a "test3" and "test4." At the end of this, if the vandal persists, he or she merits blocking for a period of time. If you do this, it will greatly help us in decreasing vandalism on Wikipedia. Much thanks, -- Kukini 19:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Understood. I guess I feel that the 4 warnings is enough "fun" allowed for the kids. But it's all good. Thanks for the response and happy editing. --Kukini 20:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

vandalism to Emperor Penguin

The King's School Canterbury

Why has the section titled 'Controversy' been deleted? It is, in fact, entirely factual.

Additionally, the school is Urban, not Suburban, as noted, and the years at the school are Shell, Remove, 5th, 6b and 6a.

--87.80.43.97 18:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I see that the culprit is now banned, so fingers crossed... Bencherlite 18:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome :-) Myanw 18:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Ryanpostlethwaite

Many thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, it was much appreciated. Regards RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

NP, glad to help :-) Myanw 18:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Userpage

No problem. Matt J ^User|Talk 12:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

ditto. :)). If you ever feel the need to have your userpage(s) semiprotected due to vandalism, just contact me. Lectonar 16:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I didn't want to imply that you couldn't keep your house clean :)); et j'ai pas de problème d'être contacté en francais: pour être honnête, il me manque un peu d'expèrience, surtout en francais écrit. Est-ce que je pourrais vous/t' intéresser à cette page-ci? on a toujous besoin de quelques yieux de plus. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar 15:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I only just noted your reply today....thanks for helping out. Lectonar 16:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks For RV

Thanks for RV on my User Page, unlikley I would have noticed it. Oliver202 18:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Sam West

Thought you should know that the page were involved in creating about Sam West the American baseball player has been replaced by a biography of the actor Sam West whose correct entry is Samuel West. Stumbled across this from a link I've now fixed in the theatre director's Steven Pimlott biography. I'm new to wikipedia and didn't know how to revert it. JCBettger 22:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Concerning blanking of page

To say I 'blanked' a page [2] is misleading and suggests that I am a vandal, which isn't true; I simply removed a photo that was dubious and inappropriate, and which has no place on a user page. Particularly when there was nothing else on the page except that photo. 212.139.255.212 10:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

How is a photo of me and my husband on our wedding day inappropriate on my userpage?Enzedbrit 02:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Concerning "field target"

This IP (192.92.126.164) changed two links position. Sorry, but they are blusterers as usual. They did the same in Italian Wikipedia and the admins stopped them. Can you reset the original positions? Thanks! You can see "field target" in Italian Wikipedia to verify it, if you want. Have a nice day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.106.57.245 (talk • contribs) 19 February 2007.

Revert of Sock Attack

Thanks for the revert on my User Page. Cheers! --EarthPerson 18:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help :-) Myanw 18:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

And thanks for the revert on my userpage. That IP's just been blocked, BTW. Cheers, Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 20:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all :-) Yeah I saw they got blocked, I gave them a test4 warning a few seconds after it happened (woops) - Myanw 21:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

60.240.156.31 (talk · contribs)

Please don't issue final warnings to users when it's clear they have made 1 edit to Wikipedia, although it may appear their only edit was likely to be disruptive. You may not be aware of the {{blatantvandal}} template, which is handy for such cases. Perhaps take a read over Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers and Wikipedia:Assume good faith to see my reasons why it's not such a good idea to chase the vandals away on little evidence of repeat disruption. -- Longhair\^talk 08:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page - Myanw 08:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies, I read the warning quickly, and it is indeed a level 3 warning. Sorry for that. You're doing the right thing, don't take me the wrong way, and any assistance in giving vandals a warning or three is always appreciated.

Sometimes vandals will stop before we bring out the harsh words like blocking. With Schapelle Corby back in the news in Australia of late, the vandals may very well be connected and acting in concert, or they're simply lone vandalistic idiots hitting mainsteam news-related articles for a thrill. Keep up the struggle though. All I really wanted to let you know was the {{bv}} template often stops them in their tracks and sends a clear message once and for all to stop, or be stopped. Cheers. -- Longhair\^talk 08:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page - Myanw 09:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Question

Well,in my opinion you used the warning templates but you don't put the article's name on it,are you saving time?Well,I think the article should be said as it providess proof for your warning. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.7.56.203 (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Replied on your talk page - Myanw 16:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Question Jewellery Vs. Jewelry

Dear Myanw,

I am emailing about your recent edit of the Jewellery category. I personally have no issue with it as I am aware there are 2 different spellings and for me, it is not a problem. However, I do feel we are having a siginifcant issue here on WP about the English VS. American spelling and I feel I have a good case to revert to the American Spelling. So - here it is. I am a graduate student at Bard here in US. I have read and researched literally hundreds of published titles on this topic. To that aim, I am endeavoring to beef up this category and help WP. However, in the act of reading many titles over many years, I have come to conclude that the American spelling is more dominent in published works on this topic. I don't have a reasoning behind why, I just know that it is so. Because of this, I feel it is neccesary to switch back to the American spelling. Even though in OED, it is jewellery, in every major book on this topic with the exception of one that is published in UK, it is spelled jewelry. For example - see what is know as "the bible on jewelry," the title is: Jewelry Concepts & Technology by Oppi Untracht. The selling used is jewelry. Another example: On Amazon, you type in both. For jewelry there are 83,868 Results, for Jewellery, there are 18,151 Results - that is a significant difference in published works. I am more than happy to provide a complete bibliography if need be, but in the interest of being user friendly, I ask that you consider this and let me know what you think. Thanks, Archie, archimartinArchiemartin

IMPORTANCE OF SUBJECT

YOU WANT IMPORTANCE OF SUBJECT HIS NAME HIS NAME IS SNAKE FUCKING DERICK —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harry4848 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

You're welcome

And thanks to you, too for reverting the damage to my user page. Silly vandals. -- No Guru 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

No Problem at all :) -Myanw 21:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Popups issue

Hi - it looks like your popups may be malfunctioning. For instance, on User:Kuru, the edit summary left after your revert was: Revert to revision $1 dated $2 by $3 using popups rather than leaving the revision numbers and the author and date. I'm not sure how to fix, but I bet you can check the popups page to figure it out. Just wanted to be sure you knew. Philippe Beaudette 02:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

I must inform you that this is a shared computer. Please block this account immediately before futher vandalism. Sorry for this inconviniece.69.217.74.98 15:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, I can't block you, happy editing - Myanw 16:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks as in Chris Helland

I noticed your warning regarding the personal attack in Chris Helland, good work. I'm wondering about starting to use this template Template:Uw-npa4im on such vicious personal attack as this one. These are clearly in accordance with "Level 4im - Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, only warning". I'd wanted to check with a more experienced user as youself. All the best, Kon-Tiki001 09:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Recent Vandalism to the Atoka, Oklahoma article

I don't know who else to report this to, but there was some vandalism done to the article on Atoka, Oklahoma. I took the liberty of reverting this vandalism. These are the vandals: 71.153.176.2, and Chetlatham. I cannot do anything about it since I'm not an administrator. However, I assume you can inform the appropriate people. Thanks! Roygene 23:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

• Oh wait, your not an administrator either. Never mind. Roygene 23:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandal RV

thanks for getting the guy that whacked my page last night! - Denny 14:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all - Myanw 16:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Your Popup vandal reverter is not working properly

The revert summary is something like (Revert to revision $1 dated $2 by $3 using popups). - Microtony 15:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)