December 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Patrick Regan has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Regan (military)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patrick Regan (military), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.homeofheroes.com/moh/citations_1918_wwi/regan.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pat Regan (anti-gun activist)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pat Regan (anti-gun activist), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Pat Regan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to fix this. Just give me a moment.--Chaser (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

You deleted my article, Pat Regan (anti-gun activist), saying it was a copy paste. This is not true and was only meant to replace the article original article "Pat Regan" with a redirect to "Pat Regan (disambiguation)". I was merely trying to differentiate two people named Pat Regan. I would appreciate if you would reinstate "Pat Regan (anti-gun activist) as it is a distinct article now.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwares212 (talkcontribs) 22:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Read the introduction of Wikipedia:How_to_fix_cut-and-paste_moves. Copy paste moves are bad. Use the move function if you want to move a page.--Chaser (talk) 23:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Billybaldwin.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Billybaldwin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tonykornheiser.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Tonykornheiser.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paulreiser.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Paulreiser.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Hello there. I have noticed that you have been adding many images that you claim to be your own work but are actually copied from other sources. Wikipedia cannot accept photos taken off of the internet. Have any other photos you uploaded come from internet sources? If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:BU Clock Tower.jpg missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:BU Clock Tower.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply