May 2021

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 11:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, MustafaKemal188119051938, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 12:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Osman Nuri Pasha, you may be blocked from editing. AramilFeraxa (talk) 11:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Jingiby: and @AramilFeraxa:, don't waste your time communicating with this vandal. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 12:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:KızılBörü1071 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:KızılBörü1071 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply