Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page The Edge of Glory, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 16:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Edge of Glory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

LOOK I WORKED FOR THE HAUSE OF GAGA, I HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE WHATEVER I WANT. OR GAGA IS GOING TO SUE THE ENTIRE SITE, DID YOU UNDERSTAND ME?

All that needs to be done is to add a source for the revisions. All revisions should include a source for the new material. Please note the Wikipedia policy located at WP:SOURCE. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 16:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Little monsters (fan)

edit

Little monsters (fan) has been proposed for deletion. Just a heads-up. Thanks Jenova20 (email) 13:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok, then Stefani is going to create it herself.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Muglergaga (talk) 14:29, 9 July 2013
You're not doing bad work, but you do appear to have a Conflict of interest. If that's the case then please do not edit Gaga-related articles directly, but instead edit the talk pages of them. Thanks Jenova20 (email) 14:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
In fact, i just noticed you have managed 40+ citations on that article in a matter of hours. That's phenomenal! The problem with the article is that it duplicates a lot of content from other articles already. It's not that it's not notable, it's that we already have it. Thanks Jenova20 (email) 14:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
No actually me & creator of gagadaily are sharing this account. As you may know she talked to Gaga earlier this year, and she said she wants a page on wikipedia about her fanbase (aka little monsters), we should have created little monsters page months ago. Since Gaga is prearing to perform on VMA's (top secret), and Interscope sent me informations about Stefani Germanotta that needs to be fixed everywhere.
What about the Little Monsters social network? That already has an article. I've relisted your article at AfD, discussion Here. Please join in. P.S. account sharing is a violation of user policy on Wikipedia (by the way). Thanks Jenova20 (email) 14:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing AfD template

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Little monsters (fan). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  22:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Lady Gaga. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply