User talk:Mstanley294/sandbox

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mstanley294 in topic Draft Peer Review

Peer Review edit

The article about "Social Construction of Nature" is very well written. I think it would be best if you could simplify the topic and make it readable to a wider reach of audience. Several of the terms used in the article can be hyperlinks to relating articles where readers could click on to learn more about the topic. I think those small changes could make the article more reader friendly. --Anthony f (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Anthony! Thank you so much, I'll definitely work on making the text more simple and clear, as well as adding hyperlinks to anything I don't expand upon. --Mstanley294 (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft Peer Review edit

Hey Megan! So this is a really cool topic to write about! I was looking at some readings and found this article from 667 a while back (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.691631). Just a suggestion, but I think it would be cool to add maybe a sentence or two about this near the end of your article and you could also link the Ubuntu philosophy to its actual wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_philosophy). I just thought that it would fit well in your article considering that it talks about other types of cognitive processes and philosophical perceptions of people’s responses to their environment.

Also, like Anthony mentioned, when you move your article into the main space, it would be a nice addition to add links to the respective Wiki pages of some of the people, terms, or ideologies that you wrote about. Really nice job! Nick Hajaly (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nick! Thank you so much, I had thought about the Ubuntu article when writing up the draft so I think that's an excellent idea! I'll incorporate it as another cultural way of relating to nature, as well as a couple other ideologies (with hyperlinks!). Thanks for the links, much appreciated! --Mstanley294 (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Overall a well written article , more sources are required as well as links to other articles Mardig94 (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Mardig94Reply

Hi Mardig! Thank you so much, I'll be incorporating another 2, maybe 3, articles to my sources. --Mstanley294 (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply