Please do not make new articles using content from copyrighted sources. --King of All the Franks 03:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Text was taken from my own personal webpage fom which I was given direct permission from the author to publish.
Thanks to Wikipedia for keeping censorship alive and well !!!!

Still, we don't accept copyrighted material in any form, regardless of whether one has permission or not. The fact that somebody could use it in bad faith away from Wikipedia is why we do this. --King of All the Franks 03:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for the tip! I wouldn't want someone to dispute my NPOV ;-)



I personally feel that editors at Wikipedia take their job way too seriously. I understand their intent, but simply because anyone who "earns" someone else's trust to do the job in a "free encyclopedia" does not merit all that much power that they display.

Lalalalala

edit

Would the total amount of happiness in your universe increase if I undeleted the old versions of your page? :-S Pegasus «C¦ 05:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

A free internet database of information edited by people with no verifiable credibility does not contribute to my happiness. --Msisshinryu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.89.220.1 (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Six-course lunch

edit

I wonder if you might be interested in reading what I've drafted HERE. As you will recall, you invited Ilvar to explain further or to comment about a recent edit made at G8. As it happens, that article is on my watchlist; and your modest -- but meaningful -- question came at a timely juncture as I continue to mull over what I think about this year's G8 meeting in Hokkaido.

If you have the time, I'd be particularly interested to discover whether this feedback could possibly inspires anything further in terms of WP:Neutral point of view?--Tenmei (talk) 20:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply