Hello. You recently replied to some old comments I posted on the Brahmanism article. It is not my intention to slander Branham or his followers, but only to properly document all of them and their beliefs. This also includes offshoots and subgroups. If you have reliable source for these groups please feel free update the article as you feel is appropriate. It is just as inaccurate to say the Junior Jackson is not part of Branhamism as it is to say that those who believe Branham was God is not part of Branhamism. They are definatly not the main part of the group - but just as on all religious articles, these things do need to be noted and not covered up. It would be like leaving the the impact of polygamy out of a article on Mormanism, or extremism out of an article on Islam. I agree that there are wackos in every group, but to be plain, the excerpt I placed on that article was from Branham's eulogy, the ideas espoused there can fairly be construed as a belief held by his followers - not necessarily by him though. The article Branhamism is about the followers of Branham and their beliefs, which obviously among some groups varies from what Branham himself taught. Charles Edward (Talk) 02:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply