Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Mirowitz distribution CDF.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Mirowitz distribution CDF.PNG. The copy called Image:Mirowitz distribution CDF.PNG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate Image:Mirowitz distribution PDF.PNG edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Mirowitz distribution PDF.PNG, by Staeckerbot, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Mirowitz distribution PDF.PNG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Mirowitz distribution PDF.PNG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Mirowitz distribution PDF.PNG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply