User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

About the RFD...

I thought it was necessary. <:)
~~LDEJRuff~~ 15:34, 24 April, 2011 (EDT)

Honey Baked Ham

Would you please participate on the talk page of Honey Baked Ham since you made one reversion? You and I agree on the redirect, but the other editor seems to not want to. I have asked him to join me in getting a third opinion, but he doesn't seem to want to participate, only revert. I have not reverted it yet. There is also a hatnote on Ham that he adds, which doesn't make sense to me as well. Not sure what the motive is, but will assume good faith, for now. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Star

Hi Mrschimpf. I saw that you uploaded a new version of File:Star Magazine Logo.png and changed it to just the logo. I had been thinking about changing it to a different cover myself. Would you be opposed to including a different cover image in the article? I tried looking for a cover image that didn't treat its subjects in a negative fashion, but that seems to be their, ah, schtick. What do you think about this one? Cheers, Gobonobo ^{T C} 06:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I've uploaded that cover image. Thank you for being open to compromise. They just came out with a new issue as well, but I think it's rather harsher. Did you want to retain the logo in the article as well? Gobonobo ^{T C} 07:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, MrSchimpf. You have new messages at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TV station vandal

We've come up with a simple plan. Please see User:Anna Frodesiak/Black sandbox. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

If there is ongoing vandalism you can request page (semi-)protection as well. Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Rmhermen (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic Coast Media Group deletion

Hello Mrschimpf --

I wanted to reach out re the Atlantic Coast Media Group article which you recommended for deletion. Excuse me if I misunderstand your reasons; I'm a relative novice to Wikipedia. Appreciate in advance your consideration of the below questions:

Can you explain how a company that has been written about in the NY Times, Inc. magazine, the Jersey Journal, nj.com, the Hudson Reporter, Beauty Fashion magazine, HAPPI magazine, Global Cosmetics Industry magazine is not noteworthy enough to merit its own article?

Where exactly is the line drawn here? Is there a clear line?

Is it relevant that you don't like the commercials for one of the products? Is it the policy of Wikipedia to delete articles if editors dislike the subject of the article?

Thank you, Skinuser (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)skinuser

Central High School

Riverview is becoming Central High School, according to the SASD website. What should we about this? Create an article and explain about it? Asher Heimermann (talk) 01:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MrSchimpf. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The sahir show radio.
Message added 15:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Assassin'S Creed ^(talk) 15:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Opera Mini for iPhone.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Opera Mini for iPhone.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Billim1: KARK-TV Logo

Hello. I have tried putting a "non-free rationale" license on the image but it still says it is having problems with it. I couldn't find an image anywhere that didn't have the "News" part cut out, so I found a website that helps edit images and it helped to take it out. All I was trying to do was to simply replace it with the one that was being to used to reflect the entire station, not just for news. I live in the area, and i've seen their commercials that use it without the "news" part. I'm still not very good at uploading images and putting the right copyright on them. If you can, help me out. Thank you. Here is that link: [1]. Billim1 (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC).

My Network TV and market numbers

I hadn't heard of that OTRS request. Any chance you could point me toward it?

Largely want to see it because I wonder if they truly can make such a claim. The FCC uses these numbers in determining public policy. Therefore that information must be available to the public. Any claim by Nielsen that it's a trade secret is questionable at best, disingenuous at worst. After all, it's simply a population figure; one could use the Census' Metropolitan Statistical Areas and get mostly the same numbers. oknazevad (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Wanting to delete the Fox Kids template

Delete all, including Ryulong's additions. None of these are needed; the category system certainly suffices just fine to categorize the shows, and these are really just regular 'list of...' articles in clumsy template form. I'd also like to add to the nomination the Template:Fox Kids (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|delete) template, which might be one of the most bloated uses of the template concept I've ever seen on here (and for crying out loud, the block ended eight years ago! It's time to let go of Fox Kids and the cruft that comes with it). All of these were inexplicably placed in the Weekend Marketplace article (an infomercial block nobody watches and I edit mainly to remind the 5 readers every six months it exists) without any rhyme or reason. Nate • (chatter) 05:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, first of all, what difference does it make that Fox Kids ended in 2002 (what that doesn't make it less relevant right from the jump)!? The whole point of the template is to serve as a navigational tool for the 12 year history of the Fox Kids block (not represent the present). Fox Kids was one of the longest running and most popular (during its heyday) children's television blocks in history. Therefore, it's naturally going to be quite huge/bloated. It would be unfair to leave shows out (and therefore, not include the entire history of the block just for the sake of what you're complaining about). Also, I included the Weekend Marketplace article because it represents the end of the line for animated programs on the Fox network in general (after the 4KidsTV programs left the network)! BornonJune8 (talk) 11:03 p.m., 06 October 2011 (UTC)