User talk:MrKIA11/Archive 5

Latest comment: 12 years ago by TL36 in topic Deleting Cherie Roberts

A Tale of Two Kingdoms

Hello! I would like to request you to reconsider this deletion. The game has been mentioned in several magazines, which I believe qualify as independent secondary sources. The mags are offline but screenshots are here: http://crystalshard.net/?f=magazine ; the game is also on IMDB here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1300599/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.86.17.210 (talk) 22:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Deleting Cherie Roberts

First of all, I have to comment I think it's ridiculous that this page even exists. Besides Cherie Roberts certainly not being a notable person, the page primarily list such doubtful sources as totallynerdcore, cars.ign.com, fleshbot.com and similar sites. Even then, many of the sources used in the article merely have her name listed along with a number of other models. Although one might think otherwise from her page, she has never had her picture in Playboy magazine (She has apparently appeared in 2 "special editions"). In the first sentence of her page, I deleted the mention of modeling for Playboy because the source made no mention of it whatsoever. However, the protectors of this site undid my revision with the claim that it's on her website but they didn't change the source. This source, by the way, is linked to SF Gate which in my opinion is the only one for the entire article that would have any claim to respectability. However, it's not correctly used. What do I need to do for this article to be deleted? I'm understand the usual process of sticking a deletion template on the page isn't the way to go.TL36 (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Since you placed only a WP:PROD tag on the article, that can be challenged by anyone and removed, as it was. You should tag the page for deletion, but with the correct template—{{subst:afd1}}—as outlined on WP:AFDHOWTO. Once you add that template, you can either continue to follow WP:AFDHOWTO, or follow the links that will be included on the template once you add it to the page. I'll keep checking on your edits in case you make a mistake. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I finally inserted {{subst:Cherie Roberts|Not notable and Poor Sources (2nd nomination}}
but the "reasons for deletion" as well as "2nd nomination" didn't show up as I expected.TL36 (talk) 12:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
You simply did it wrong. WP:AFDHOWTO outlines the exacts steps, but long story short, you have to place {{subst:afdx|2nd}} on the article's page, then place {{subst:afd2|pg=Cherie Roberts|cat=B|text=Not notable and Poor Sources. ~~~~}} on the nomination page. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your assistance but I've received a note from an "inclusionist" and am backing-off on my attempt to have the page deleted at this time.TL36 (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Jordian Farahani deletion nomination

Thanks for your help. I had trouble figuring out how to do this. This is like, only the second time I've used the deletion template. – Michael (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. The format for future reference is {{subst:afd2|pg=Page Name|cat=Category|text=Your reason for deletion}}. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Berezuik

Hi, I see you deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Berezuik, I nominated this page for deletion, it's obviously a 'joke' page that should be deleted. Zarcadia (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

From what I could tell, a WP:CSD template would have sufficed, and you attempted to place one during one of your edits. I agree, and went ahead and just deleted the page to save time. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
That's great, thanks. Zarcadia (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Heart

Just wanted to let you know that Mesoderm put Zack Heart's page up for deletion. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 13:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Toolbar

I see that in May you were close to getting an updated toolbar for FF 4.0; however FF 5.0 is out. Did you end up getting the Beta working and if so, did you need more testers or can I test it for you.speednat (talk) 03:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Yeah :/ It's pretty much done. I was just having problems getting a version working for both 3.6.x and 4.x/5.x. I've been busy, but I still plan to finish it when I get a chance. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Reply related to this

@MrKIA11 (talk) Whatever it is either right or wrong, try to fix it! j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 12:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)