Mr.Mario 192
Welcome!
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 04:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Super Mario 64 appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Rjd0060 22:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- That is fine. But when you changed it, it said it was "THE" greatest game, which well, is a point of view statement. - Rjd0060 22:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia edit
My name is Trevor, or Tinkleheimer. I have been an editor here for over a year, but actively for several months. If you need any help, feel free to let me know on my talk page. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 01:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The source for my statement edit
It was from Sakurai's Journal which he kept on the original SSBB japanese site. The site is no longer up since it has been replaced by the Dojo. Shyrangerr (talk) 23:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism edit
If you actually read what the edit summary says: "Reverted 1 edit by 68.224.253.159 identified as vandalism to last revision by Mr.Mario 192. using TW" You can see that I never accused you of vandalism. I reverted an edit by an anonymous user which was clearly vandalism. The edit summary states that it reverted back to your last edit of the page. So please carefully read edit summaries and look at difs before you start accusing people of not assuming good faith.sdgjake (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Source? edit
Do you have a source for the Venice thing regarding Mario and Luigi? That would be something to cover under the body of the article itself but has no mention it seems.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)