Mp7774

You have already flagged the page for "Adam Storch" for sveral things including that it has too much information coming from the subject. Well, I'm not saying the information is incorrect, but it is eztremely likele that he did input all of that information himself. I don't know if that matters, but I wanted to pretty much confirm your suspicion. Is that a reason that you will always take down a post? No, I am serious. I have written quite a bit and believe I created a few pages, and would be interested in knowing why if the information is accurate, that you might

Previous page I just sent you was not completed and had misspellings as I was not able to regain control of the cursor.

The page of Adam Storch is flagged for several reasons including that the article may rely on information too closely related to the subject which I assume is a euphemism for that you suspect the subject of the biography wrote it. I knew him for a very long time when I dated his sister for 6 years, but I was friends with him before that. I certainly can't guarantee it, but him writing the article himself seems like exactly something he would do. And there is no bad blood at all between us as you may think because I used to have a relationship with his sister. I have written many articles and I am unclear what makes a biography of someone pass your standards of the person being notable enough. I am an attorney who is having an autobiography published this fall. Since a big chunk is devoted to releasing a lot of behind the scenes discussions with well known politicians, in addition to a string of police brutality, misconduct, kidnapping, false arrest and attempted murder indictment, but he had already fled, and there is something extremely unique in one of the stories which my agent said that line and story would go "viral" in about 72 hours and I'm not interested in being a public figure but it seems like I'll be asked for interviews from everybody from the Today Show to CNN to every newspaper to every entertainment tabloid show. Does that make me well-known enough to be the subject of an article? It is not that I want that but what are the requirements of someone's fame before they can be the subject of an article? 'm even more interested now because of my situation. I always thought that since I have worked so long in NYC politics and everyone, including the Mayor, knows me, should someone write an article about me, and there would be plenty of hyperlinks in other articles. Hypothetically, would that make me notable enough? I'm simply very interested as to where and how the line is drawn.. Obviously the more articles in an encyclopedia the more in-depth it is while at the same time when regarding biographies, you don't want it to be the whitepages, and everyone writing an article about him or herself. Also, say just as another hypothetical, say somehow an article was never written on Matt Lauer. Is Matt Lauer allowed to write the article himself? Thanks and keep up the great work, I've donated fairly regularly to you for at least 5 years now. If you can direct me to a page where I can send you another donation via PayPal or Credit Card, I would appreciate that. My email address is mprete@gmail.com

RIGHT NOW THE CURSOR WENT BACK TO THIS SPOT. READ WHAT I WROTE BEL0W. I THINK THERE IS APROBLEM WITH THIS PAGE AS MY COMPUTER SEEMS TO BE WORKING FINE. I don't think you have my current email which is above. I believe you would have mp7774@aol.com, How can I change that? Also while typing on this page, I cannot move the cursor to click on a word in an earlier sentence. It simply won't show that cursor in a new location, and subsequently I cannot go back. Maybe there is kzkkj

==

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rush Limbaugh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --TheAlderaanian (talk) 04:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)