User talk:Mopswade/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

SPI

You used this syntax

* [[User talk:NavjotSR|07:46, 10 April 2020]] [[User talk:NavjotSR|diff]] [[User talk:NavjotSR|hist]] <span class="mw-changeslist-separator"></span> '''-1,513'''‎ <span class="mw-changeslist-separator"></span> [[User talk:NavjotSR]] ‎ Undid revision 950107764 by [[Special:Contributions/Mopswade|Mopswade]] ([[User talk:Mopswade|talk]]) [[Special:Tags|Tag]]: [[wikipedia:Undo|Undo]]

returning this line

• 07:46, 10 April 2020 diff hist  -1,513‎  User talk:NavjotSR ‎ Undid revision 950107764 by Mopswade (talk) Tag: Undo

The correct links are (which I don't recommend, I just did it to see if I could) :

* [[Special:Permalink/950109099|07:46, 10 April 2020]] ([[Special:Diff/950109099|diff]] | {{Querylink|User talk:NavjotSR|qs=action=history|hist}}) '''-1,513''' [[User talk:NavjotSR]] Undid revision 950107764 by [[Special:Contributions/Mopswade|Mopswade]] ([[User talk:Mopswade|talk]]) [[Special:Tags|Tag]]: [[wikipedia:Undo|Undo]]

returning this line

• 07:46, 10 April 2020 (diff | hist) -1,513 User talk:NavjotSR Undid revision 950107764 by Mopswade (talk) Tag: Undo

An external link is easier...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=NavjotSR&namespace=3&tagfilter=&start=2020-04-10&end=2020-04-10&limit=250&title=Special%3AContributions

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=NavjotSR&namespace=3&tagfilter=&start=2020-04-10&end=2020-04-10&limit=250&title=Special%3AContributions

and Querylink is cleaner...

{{Querylink|Special:Contributions/NavjotSR|qs=namespace=3&start=2020-04-10&end=2020-04-10&limit=10|history}}

history

But really, all we want at SPI is the diff, Special:Diff/950109099. One diff for the master, one diff for the sock, a matched pair that shows the two of them doing the same thing. The more you write, the more that someone else has to read, and the more likely it is that your point will be lost in the wall of text. You say you wanted to show the timings of the edits, all I saw as a set of diffs which didn't point where they should, or to any meaningful evidence.

A few other points

• please don't post in the Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments section, the evidence section is yours, or the Comments by other users section on a report filed by someone else;
• please don't edit anything in the SPI Archives;
• please don't edit reports after they've been closed; and
• please don't file multiple reports against the same accounts.

Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, the "please don't file multiple reports against the same accounts" was somebody else's mistake today, not yours. Cabayi (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, I'll take a look at what happened to the diffs and keep in mind your comments if such an occasion happens in the future. Many thanks, Mopswade (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)